Globalization Of Financial Markets By Leon Wang



The micro-financial perspective, in turn, directs our attention to the financial sector structure, how the process of financial deepening transformed it in recent years and how local authorities responded to the increasing pressures generated by an increasingly globally connected banking sector. But cross-funding, local regulation and financial stability are certainly difficult to match, even at developed countries as the European crisis demonstrates. This triplet conforms the so-called financial trilemma introduced by Schoenmaker, and analyzed in the book—particularly observing how selected countries performed it. Its global surveillance initiatives to enhance its ability to manage international financial stability must also stay in track. Private financial institutions and market players can now contribute to financial stability by managing their businesses well and avoiding unnecessary risk-taking.

Regulators in the major trading nations need to address the possibility of a full-scale breakdown of the financial system. In 2007 globalisation reached its peak with global cross-border capital flows amounting to approximately $11.8 trillion. However, the financial crisis that followed contributed to a reversal in this trend, with markets showing the first signs of ‘deglobalisation’ as a result. The recent Covid-19 pandemic is likely to cause another enormous stress test for globalisation, forcing firms and nations to limit traveling and trade, perhaps leading to a reevaluation of the interconnected global economy. FDI has decreased by 60% since its peak in 2007, with cross-border financial flows experiencing a similar trend . Deglobalisation could have severe consequences for investors looking for diversification opportunities since it entails more segmented markets, leading to an increase in idiosyncratic risks, as well as in transaction costs.

So improving our collective understanding of the factors affecting the resilience of the global financial system is essential for achieving the OFR mission. Abstracting from risk aversion or hedging motives, this paper shows that catastrophe insurance may have a catalytic role on external finance. Such effect is particularly strong in those middle-income countries that face financial constraints when hit by a shock or in its anticipation. Insurance makes defaults less appealing, relaxes countries' borrowing constraint, increases their creditworthiness, and enhances their access to capital markets.

An additional driving force for financial service firms' geographic diversification has been the proliferation of corporate combination strategies such as mergers, acquisitions, strategic alliances and outsourcing. Such consolidation strategies may improve efficiency within the industry, resulting in M&As, voluntary exit, or forced withdrawal of poorly performing firms. Deregulation has also been the major factor behind this geographic diversification, and beginning in the early 1980s, a sequence of policy changes implemented a gradual reduction of intrastate and interstate banking restrictions.

Liberalization of national financial and capital markets − Liberalization and fast improvements in IT and the globalization of national economies have resulted in highly spread financial innovations. Research and academic institutions, professional associations, and think-tanks aim to observe, model, understand, and publish recommendations to improve the transparency and effectiveness of the global financial system. For example, the independent non-partisan World Economic Forum facilitates the Global Agenda Council on the Global Financial System and Global Agenda Council on the International Monetary System, which report on systemic risks and assemble policy recommendations.

As a member of the policy community now, I can testify that cooperation and coordination in policy, both domestically and globally, is still challenging. Toolkit best practices dictate that a tool is needed to counter each source of financial instability. For example, if policymakers want to combat excessive leverage, insufficient liquidity, and procyclicality, a satisfactory toolkit must contain tools to address each one, such as capital, liquidity, and haircuts or margin regulations (Kashyap, Berner and Goodhart ; Hanson, Kashyap and Stein ). Policymakers should also assign to each target the right tool for the job — the one that has the biggest influence on the policy objective. At the OFR, we have developed new risk-assessment tools to assess separately vulnerabilities and stress; we think that separating them will enable us and users to identify early warning signs, whether in firms or in markets (OFR ).

Understanding the factors that unify and that separate financial markets and thus reconciling these two stylized facts is at the core of this book. While the main focus of the empirical work is on banking industry, results are yet informative also with regard to developments in other financial market segments. Also, the book uses #diyinvesting European financial integration as a case study for general integration trends. However, globalization has not materially affected the ability of the Federal Reserve to influence financial conditions in the United States.

Policies to make national financial systems more resilient to those shocks have thus become essential parts of the macroprudential toolkit. And the financial trilemma means that policymakers need to coordinate those policies across borders (Haldane ; Berner ; DTCC ). The OFR was established to identify, assess, and monitor threats to financial stability.

Next, we analyse correlations between monthly equity excess returns, comparing correlation matrices by using the tests proposed by Goetzmann et al. . In sum, we allow for the possibility of globalisation associated with the systematic source of return variation. CGEG is a premier Center for producing a new wave of policy-oriented research on global economic governance bringing together key players from the academic, policy, and business world. In the days before the Fed decision, the stock markets went up and then as soon as the Fed began to make its announcement the stock market started to decline. He also cited the situation in China over the summer as an example, where the market reaction was based on what it believed the Chinese government would do in response to any volatility.

The Global Crisis reversed this expansion and highlighted the vulnerabilities intrinsic to the globalised international economy. This column takes a historical approach to the debate, analysing how patterns of globalisation and contagion have changed over time. The patterns also suggest that the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic is likely to cause another enormous ‘stress test’ for globalisation, forcing firms and nations to limit traveling and trade, perhaps leading to a reevaluation of the international system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *